SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
In the Simulated Process Color Screen Printing category, first place was awarded to “Josh Turner,” which was created by Anderson Studio Inc., Nashville, Tenn. This design was created using M&R Challenger equipment, Wilflex and Adobe Photoshop software. (615) 255-4807; andersonstudioinc.com.
SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
“Hellfire,” a design by Blue Moon, Eastlake, Ohio, was awarded second place in the Simulated Process category. This design was produced with the help of an MHM E-Type 8-color press, Union Unimatch and Adobe Photoshop software. (440) 942-6055; bmpromotional.com.
SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
Also by Anderson Studio Inc., Nashville, Tenn., the third place winner in the Simulated Process category was a design titled “Michelle Wright.” This design was created using M&R Challenger equipment, Wilflex and Adobe Photoshop software. (615) 255-4807; andersonstudioinc.com.
SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
In the Manual Textile Screen Printing category, the first place award was given to “XCFL Fightwear,” a design by Unik Ink Specialty Printing, Ridgeland, Miss. Using Workhorse equipment, Matsui and Adobe Illustrator software, this design was brought to life. (601) 259-1004; unikink.com.
SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
Second place in the Manual category was awarded to “Iguana,” a design created by Tropic Images S.A., San Rafael Heredia, Costa Rica, using M&R equipment and Rutland. tropicalcr.com.
SCREEN PRINTING Simulated Process and Manual
A design by SAW Textiles, Bartlett, Tenn., called “Ozark Motor Lines” won third place in the Manual category. A Workhorse 6-color 6-station press, Union Mixo and FastFilms were used to create this design. (800) 238-3304; sawtextiles.com.